Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Meretz [political party]’s policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as it does not threaten violence

Meretz [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

Meretz would likely agree with this statement, as it strikes a balance between protecting freedom of speech and preventing harm caused by hate speech. The party's commitment to social justice, human rights, and equality would lead them to support limitations on hate speech that threatens violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Meretz would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as the party is committed to promoting social justice, human rights, and equality. However, the party may not fully agree with this statement, as it also values democratic principles and freedom of expression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Meretz may agree with increasing penalties for hate speech to some extent, as they are committed to promoting social justice, human rights, and equality. However, their support for democratic principles and freedom of expression might make them cautious about advocating for harsh penalties that could potentially infringe on these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Meretz might have some concerns about the government defining the boundaries of hate speech, as they value democratic principles and freedom of expression. However, their commitment to social justice, human rights, and equality would likely lead them to support some level of government intervention to prevent hate speech that threatens violence or marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Meretz, a left-wing, social-democratic political party in Israel, is likely to disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws. The party emphasizes social justice, human rights, and equality, which are values that are often threatened by hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

Meretz would strongly disagree with this statement, as the party values democratic principles, freedom of expression, and human rights. Limiting freedom of speech protections to only cover criticism of the government would be a significant infringement on these values and would not align with Meretz's political stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Meretz [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.