Should corporations, unions, and non-profit organizations be allowed to donate to political parties?

Yes, but with total transparency. Any political donation above a specified level must be reported. Elected officials found guilty of violating campaign finance laws should be summarily ejected from office

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be disclosed to ensure these donations are not used as bribes. Also, we should limit the amount of donations to any political party that can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate.

Only grass roots donations.

Any organization that receives money from the government should not be able to donate to political parties, that breeds corruption.

Only grassroots donations.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be publicly disclosed. Limit the amount a political party can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate, so that these donations cannot turn into bribes.

Only grassroots donations

Yes, but with the exception of companies that have recently committed or are suspected of being immoral.

Yes, but excludes companies currently engaged in immoral practices or in controversy about it.

Yes, but with the exception of companies that have recently committed or suspected of being immoral.

Yes, only grassroots donations.

No, their members can donate on an individual basis.

Yes, but make candidates announce which corporations donate to them on their commercials

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be disclosed to promote transparency and to ensure that these donations cannot turn into bribes. Also, limit the amount of donations that a political party can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate.

Only grassroots

No, only grassroots donations.

Grassroots donations only

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge. To prevent corruption, we should limit the amount a political party can receive in total, as well as the amount of any group they can donate to; it also has to be publicly disclosed, and it cannot turn into a bribe. In addition, voters should be free to decide and allow donations that come from individuals as well.

Yes, but all the donations must be public knowledge; limit the amount a political party can receive in total, and limit the amount a single corporation can donate; it also has to be publicly disclosed, and it cannot turn into a bribe. In addition, allow donations that come from individuals and allow them to publicly fund elections as well.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge. We should limit the amount a political party can receive in total, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate; it also has to be publicly disclosed, and it cannot turn into a bribe. In addition, voters should be free to decide and allow donations that come from individuals as well.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and it should be publicly disclosed. We should limit the amount a political party can receive in total, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate, so that these donations cannot turn into bribes.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be publicly disclosed to ensure that these donations cannot turn into bribes. Limit the amount a political party can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be publicly disclosed. We should limit the amount a political party can receive in total, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate, so that donations cannot turn into bribes.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be disclosed to promote transparency, and to ensure that these donations cannot turn into bribes. Also, limit the amount of donations that any political party can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be disclosed to promote transparency, and to ensure that these donations are not bribes. Also, limit the amount of donations that any political party can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate.

As long as they are made known to the public of who is donating to who, I have any problem with donations to politicians, no matter how saturated they may be in funding.

I would prefer not and for there to be a limit, but it is their money and affects how they look, not me.

yes, except unions.

If you ban it, they will still do it.

How do you think money influences the fairness of elections in your country?

Have you ever considered how campaign donations might affect the decisions of elected officials?

Should there be limits on how much individuals or companies can donate to political campaigns, and why?

How might a candidate winning due to huge financial backing make you feel about the future of democracy?

Do you think public perception of a candidate changes based on where their campaign money comes from?

How would you feel if a politician you support accepted large donations from groups you disagree with?

What, in your opinion, would make political campaigns more accessible for candidates without wealthy connections?

Should there be more transparency in who is funding political campaigns? Why or why not?

How would knowing where a candidate’s money comes from influence your decision to vote for them?

If campaigns were entirely government-funded and private donations banned, how do you think elections would change?

Yes but only to the Republican Party.

Abolish democracy

No Abolish democracy

Yes, as long as the information is public knowledge and easily accessible.

i dont have a stance

Yes, as long as no contingencies, strings, or obligations are attached to donations

Yes, but limit amounts, and we should give democracy vouchers to every citizen to choose the candidates or parties they would like to donate to

Yes, as long as the donations are easily seen public knowledge.

No, because these types of donations just turn into bribes from corporations, but allow donations from unions and non-profits, since (I think) they don't have a record of bribing political parties

No, only individual voters should be allowed to finance political campaigns.

Allow unions to donate, but not corporations or organizations.

Yes, but not from Non-profits

Yes, and donations should be publicly disclosed

Yes, nothing can stop this, trying to prevent it would just make things less transparent

No, should switch to public funded.

Yes, as long as donation amounts are made anonymous to preserve nuetrality.

Non profit organizations should not be allowed to donate to politicians.

Allow limited donations from Unions and Non-Profit Organizations, but not from corporations.

No, but allow donations and endorsements from non-profits, and endorsements from unions.

No, but allow donations and endorsements from non-profits.

Allow donations from citizen's groups with disclosure; disallow donations from organizations not created for political support purposes. This is an extremely complex issue

Only corporations should be able to donate to political parties.

No, We should instate the Democracy Dollars program proposed by Andrew Yang

No, but the unions should be allowed to voice a political stance as long as they do not intimidate members into voting.

Yes, but disallow donations from unions

yes, and political campaigns should be publicly funded

Yes, but limit the amount they can donate and all donations should be made public knowledge.

yes and they should be publicly done.

No, political campaigns should be publicly funded, but allow nonprofits to donate.

Yes, they should be able to donate as much as they please.

No, political parties should not receive any funding

Yes, but it should go towards a pot where all candidates receive equal amounts to campaign from.

Yes, as long it is public knowledge

Yes, Only Organizations who're based in the United States should be able to donate.

yes, but the amount they can donate and the amount of donation should be publicly disclosed.

Yes, but not from unions or non-profit organizations, only private companies

No, but allow for non-profits and corporations

Yes, but only non-profit organizations and unions, not corporations

Only if the donations are publicly known

Yes; allow donations from unions, but limit the amount they can donate, and political campaigns should be publicly funded

Yes but only if its your money and not if its a collective fund.

Yes, but viewable to the public.

Not from corporations or unions, but an exception can be mde for non-profits within reasonable limits.

Yes, but non-profit organizations should not be allowed to

not non-profits but everything else is ok

No political parties can get they own bread let these non-profit organizations get they money.

If they are grassroots

Yes. they can decide what they want to do.

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be disclosed to ensure these donations are not used as for bribing politicians. Also, we should limit the amount of donations to any political party that can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate.

Yes but all donations should be public

Yes, but all donations must be public knowledge and should be disclosed to promote transparency, and to ensure that these donations are not used as bribes. Also, limit the amount of donations that any political party can receive, as well as the amount of any corporation/organization they can donate.