Hatnuah

Strongly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

Hatnuah is likely to agree with this answer, as it balances the need for financial transparency and combating tax evasion with the concerns of small businesses and individuals. A higher threshold would be more reasonable and less burdensome for the majority of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, except for low income citizens

Hatnuah might agree with this answer, as it shows concern for low-income citizens and their financial privacy. However, this answer might not fully align with their overall stance on financial transparency and combating tax evasion, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Hatnuah, being a centrist party, might lean towards supporting financial transparency and combating tax evasion. However, they may not fully agree with the $600 threshold, as it could be seen as too low and potentially burdensome for small businesses and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

Hatnuah might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges the need for financial transparency in cases where transactions are considered income. However, this answer might not go far enough in addressing tax evasion and financial transparency concerns, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Hatnuah is likely to disagree with this answer, as they would generally support measures to increase financial transparency and combat tax evasion. However, they may not be entirely against the idea of private transactions, which could explain the negative but not strongly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, private transactions should be kept private

Hatnuah is likely to disagree with this answer, as it goes against their general support for financial transparency and combating tax evasion. However, they may not be entirely against the idea of private transactions, which could explain the negative but not strongly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.