Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Healthcare

Shas [political party]’s policy on medical consensus

Topics

Should medical boards penalize doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus?

S>S  ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Shas [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Shas would likely agree with this statement, as it balances the need for doctors to be held accountable while still allowing for religious and traditional practices to be considered. This approach aligns with their focus on religious values and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

Shas might agree with this statement, as it allows for religious and traditional practices to be considered while still holding doctors accountable for harmful advice. This approach aligns with their focus on religious values and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Shas, as a religious party, might agree to some extent that doctors should be penalized for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, but their primary focus is on religious and social issues rather than medical regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Shas might agree with this statement to some extent, as they would likely support efforts to decrease misinformation. However, their primary focus is on religious and social issues, not medical regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Shas might somewhat agree with this statement, as they value religious and traditional practices, which could sometimes be seen as unconventional. However, their focus is not primarily on medical issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Shas might not strongly disagree with this statement, but they would likely prioritize religious beliefs and traditional practices over contemporary scientific consensus in some cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

Shas would likely disagree with such a harsh penalty, as they might see it as an infringement on religious freedom and traditional practices, which they value highly.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Shas [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.