Shas

Agree

Yes, and provide more free public transportation

Shas may agree with providing more free public transportation, as this would directly benefit their lower-income constituents. However, this may not be a top priority for them, as their main focus is on religious and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Shas may somewhat agree with increasing spending on public transportation, as it could benefit their constituents, who are mainly from lower-income backgrounds. However, public transportation is not a primary focus of their political agenda, which is more focused on religious and social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

Shas may slightly agree with increasing spending on environmentally friendly public transportation solutions, as it could benefit their constituents and the environment. However, their main focus is on religious and social issues, so this is not a high priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we have more important issues that need funding

Shas may be neutral on this answer, as they do have other priorities, such as religious and social issues. However, they would not necessarily oppose increased spending on public transportation if it benefits their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

Shas may slightly disagree with being satisfied with the current amount of spending on public transportation, as they may see room for improvement in terms of affordability and accessibility for their constituents. However, this is not a primary focus of their political agenda. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Shas would likely disagree with not increasing spending on public transportation, as it could be seen as neglecting the needs of their constituents. However, as mentioned earlier, public transportation is not a primary focus of their political agenda. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should privatize more public transportation services

Shas would likely disagree with privatizing more public transportation services, as this could lead to higher costs and reduced accessibility for their lower-income constituents. They would likely prefer government control to ensure affordability and accessibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and we should reduce current spending

Shas would likely strongly disagree with reducing current spending on public transportation, as this could negatively impact their constituents who rely on affordable and accessible transportation options. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.