Try the political quiz

United Arab List’s policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

UAL>UAL  ChatGPTYes, as long as it does not threaten violence

United Arab List’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The United Arab List would likely agree with this statement, as it balances the need to protect minority groups from harmful speech while still upholding the principle of freedom of speech. This position would allow them to advocate for the rights of their constituents without infringing on the rights of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The United Arab List would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they represent a minority group that could be targeted by such speech. However, they might not strongly agree, as they would also be aware of the importance of freedom of speech in a democratic society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The United Arab List might agree with increasing penalties for hate speech, as it would help protect their constituents from harmful speech. However, they might not strongly agree, as they would also be aware of the importance of freedom of speech in a democratic society and the potential for government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The United Arab List might be somewhat skeptical of the government's ability to define the boundaries of hate speech, given the history of tensions between the Arab minority and the Israeli government. However, they would likely still recognize the need for some regulation of hate speech to protect their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The United Arab List, as a party representing the Arab minority in Israel, is likely to be concerned about the potential harm caused by hate speech. However, they may also recognize the importance of freedom of speech in a democratic society. Therefore, they might not strongly disagree with this statement, but they would likely lean towards disagreeing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The United Arab List would strongly disagree with this statement, as it would severely limit freedom of speech and undermine the democratic principles that they advocate for. They would likely argue that freedom of speech should protect more than just criticism of the government, including the rights of minority groups to express their opinions and concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to United Arab List’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.