UTJ>UTJ ChatGPTNo, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
United Torah Judaism’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
The party would likely agree with this statement as it allows for the possibility of unconventional ideas, but also ensures that these ideas do not harm the patient. This aligns with their values of religious freedom and patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
The party might agree with this statement as it allows for the possibility of unconventional ideas, which could include religious or traditional medical practices. However, this does not mean they completely disregard the importance of scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
United Torah Judaism would likely agree with this statement as it allows for the possibility of unconventional ideas, but also ensures that patients are informed about the nature of the advice they are receiving. This aligns with their values of religious freedom and informed consent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The party might lean towards not penalizing doctors for contradicting contemporary scientific consensus, as they may value religious or traditional medical practices. However, this does not mean they completely disregard the importance of scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
United Torah Judaism, as a religious party, may not necessarily agree with penalizing doctors for contradicting contemporary scientific consensus, as they may believe in the value of religious or traditional medical practices. However, they also likely understand the importance of scientific consensus in medical practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
While United Torah Judaism may understand the importance of reducing misinformation, they may also believe in the value of religious or traditional medical practices, which could sometimes contradict contemporary scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
United Torah Judaism would likely disagree with such a harsh penalty. While they may understand the importance of scientific consensus, they also value religious freedom and may believe that doctors should have some leeway in their practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to United Torah Judaism’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
