+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.4k Labor Party voters.

81%
Yes
19%
No
73%
Yes
13%
No
5%
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
2%
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
2%
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
2%
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
1%
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
1%
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.4k Labor Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.4k Labor Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Labor Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9LSXB4Gfrom California  answered…7mos7MO

I think it shouldn't be required, but it should be an option at a certain age for free, or if religious beliefs prevent the use of vaccines, but should be required if it is deadly or contagious.

 @9KGV6YVfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

If one is born in Israel or wishes to move there, then one accept the vaccination provisions as they exist. But with all future vaccine mandates, there should be reasonable debate allowed.

 @9FG7MNVfrom Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

If absolutely necessary, the safety/effectiveness of which has been independently verified by an untainted scientific community.

 @946LJ97answered…2yrs2Y

 @99BQRFGanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only to degrees that pose a serious and legitimate risk to the child.