+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1k Radical Centrism voters.

16%
Yes
84%
No
5%
Yes
80%
No
7%
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
4%
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
3%
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
2%
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1k Radical Centrism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1k Radical Centrism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Radical Centrism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9WPNHYH from Arkansas  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, if someone can prove that even if they did commit a crime, they can do better than the other political opponent, then they should be allowed to run.

 @9TRBS6Xfrom Maryland  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but the case should be resolved before in office and has to be extremely detrimental to security of the state.

 @9LC4TPN from Pennsylvania  answered…9mos9MO

Simply worried it can be used to go after political opponents. My understanding is Erdogan and Putin have jailed or got political opponents sued or in trouble as they ascended to power by taking advantage of a corrupted legal system. I think only in the cases of insurrection, treason, war crimes, or corruption should they be prevented and in fact in jail for life.

 @9HKX6M6from Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, as long as it was not an act of terrorism or treason and as long as they have finished serving their sentence

 @9DCJTSDfrom New York  answered…1yr1Y

 @8RQCWMVanswered…4yrs4Y

It depends on the nature of the crime, whether the sentence is completed, and particularly whether it was an abuse of power.