+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 809 Secularism voters.

60%
Yes
40%
No
56%
Yes
29%
No
3%
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
11%
No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities
1%
Yes, and abolish the police

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 809 Secularism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 809 Secularism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Secularism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9QQQNTLfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Some funding should be redirected to unarmed mental health professionals and responders for appropriate calls

 @9LC4TPN from Pennsylvania  answered…8mos8MO

We should increase funding of social programs and other means of preventing crime and reducing poverty. We should also commit to a more effective rehab system. Once we see a reduction in crime rates from these programs we can slowly ease off police force funding in accordance to how high or low crime is

 @9HKX6M6from Maryland  answered…12mos12MO

No, fund police to fight crime but also fund unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

 @9HDPVGPanswered…12mos12MO

Depends on the location, near borders police departments should get a relatively higher police budget than that of non-border police departments.

 @9GJ4LW5from Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

No, fund the police to fight crime, but also fund unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls.

 @95YRDMLanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9C5SMN3from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BG52L6from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, redirect funding from mental health issues and non violent crime like drugs to social and community based programs

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Defunding the Police” news articles, updated frequently.