Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
District
Response rates from 516 Economic Liberalism voters.
66% Yes |
34% No |
48% Yes |
31% No |
17% Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
3% No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
0% Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment |
1% No, too many people are innocently convicted |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 516 Economic Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 516 Economic Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Economic Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9M6Q5BT7mos7MO
For terrorists - now! For any other crime - renew the sanhedrin first. Until then, it's life sentence in solitary confinement (but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence and if the criminal doesn't do recovery program)
@96KL46D2yrs2Y
@8VZ8FF23yrs3Y
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence but the death penalty should be allowed in case prisons get overpopulated
@8VB2CZJ3yrs3Y
Only for refugees and terrorist.
@8RLWZM64yrs4Y
Yes but only if proven beyond a reasonable doubt and only because of extremely henious crimes murder etc
@8QV64H34yrs4Y
In principle yes, provided its use is sparing, reserved for only the most horrific crimes.
@8QMTGPW4yrs4Y
Gulag is significantly more efficient and doesn't consume our nation's tax money.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
