Meretz [political party]

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

Meretz would likely agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and practices. They would believe that penalizing doctors for giving health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help decrease misinformation and protect patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

Meretz, as a left-wing party, generally supports evidence-based policies and practices. They would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, but their stance might not be as strong as other more radical parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.

Meretz might somewhat agree with this answer, as it promotes transparency and allows patients to make informed decisions. However, they might still prefer stronger measures to ensure that doctors provide accurate and scientifically supported health advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.

While Meretz supports evidence-based policies, they might not be as extreme as to advocate for doctors losing their medical licenses for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. Their stance would depend on the severity of the misinformation and potential harm to patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą

Meretz's stance on this answer would likely be neutral. While they support evidence-based policies, they might not necessarily agree with penalizing doctors only when their advice has been proven to harm patients, as this could still allow for misinformation to spread. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.

Meretz would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. However, they might acknowledge that scientific consensus can change and that there could be some room for unconventional ideas, but not at the expense of patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

Meretz would likely disagree with this answer, as they tend to support evidence-based policies and practices. They would likely believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate and scientifically supported health advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.