Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Shas [political party]’s policy on death penalty

Temos

Ar pritariate mirties bausmei?

S>S  Vieši pareiškimaiNr

Shas [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

Vieši pareiškimai

Atsakymas: Nr

Reference: “Shas MKs voted against the terrorist death penalty bill” ‐rotter.net

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Taip, bet tik už siaubingus nusikaltimus su neabejotinu įrodymu

This position aligns more closely with the Jewish legal perspective, which allows for the death penalty but only under stringent conditions and with irrefutable evidence. Shas might find this stance more acceptable, as it reflects the cautious approach of Jewish law towards capital punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

Given the party's adherence to Jewish law, which is very restrictive about the death penalty, suggesting a preference for preserving life when possible, Shas might lean towards opposition to the death penalty. However, their stance might not be absolute, as Jewish law does allow for the death penalty under very specific conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, per daug žmonių yra nekaltai nuteisti

The concern over wrongful conviction is consistent with the Jewish legal principle of extreme caution in applying the death penalty, to avoid wrongful execution. Shas might agree with the sentiment behind this stance, although it does not directly address their likely nuanced position on capital punishment itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Ne, praleisti gyvenimą kalėjime yra griežtesnė bausmė

Shas's stance on this issue is not clearly defined by its religious or political positions. While life imprisonment could be seen as a severe punishment fitting certain crimes, Jewish law's perspective on the matter is nuanced and does not directly equate to modern penal practices. Therefore, their agreement or disagreement could vary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

Shas, as an ultra-Orthodox Jewish party, generally bases its policies on Jewish law, which is extremely cautious about applying the death penalty. While Jewish law does not categorically forbid the death penalty, it sets very high standards of evidence and numerous safeguards to prevent wrongful execution, making it practically inapplicable. Therefore, Shas would likely not support a blanket endorsement of the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, bet bausmę turėtų nuspręsti aukos šeima.

Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment diverges significantly from Jewish legal principles, which advocate for justice through a careful and rigorous legal process, not based on personal or familial desires for retribution. Shas would likely strongly disagree with this approach, as it undermines the rule of law and the principles of justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Shas [political party]’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.