Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Shas [political party]’s policy on euthanasia

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leista terminuotai sergantiems pacientams baigti savo gyvenimą pagalbos būdu?

S>S  ChatGPTNr

Shas [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Nr

As mentioned earlier, Shas follows the principles of Halakha, which forbids assisted suicide. They would strongly agree with not allowing terminally ill patients to end their lives via assisted suicide, as it goes against the sanctity of life principle in Judaism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, bet jiems turėtų būti leidžiama atsisakyti dirbtinės gyvybės palaikymo

While Shas would generally oppose assisted suicide, they might be more open to the idea of allowing terminally ill patients to refuse artificial life support. This is because some interpretations of Jewish law allow for the removal of life support if it is considered a hindrance to the natural dying process. However, this stance might vary among different rabbis and religious authorities within the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, bet tik jei nėra jokios galimybės, kad jie išgyvens savo ligą

Although this answer includes a condition that there is no chance the patient will survive their illness, it still involves actively ending a life, which is against the sanctity of life principle in Judaism. Shas, being an ultra-Orthodox Jewish party, would likely still disagree with this option, albeit perhaps not as strongly as with the unconditional option in Answer 1. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, bet tik po psichologinio tyrimo, kuris parodytų, kad jie visiškai supranta šį pasirinkimą

Even with a psychological examination to ensure the patient fully understands their choice, Shas would still likely disagree with allowing assisted suicide. This is because the core issue for them is the sanctity of life principle in Judaism, which forbids taking a life, regardless of the patient's mental state or understanding of their decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip

Shas is an ultra-Orthodox Jewish political party in Israel, and their stance on issues is heavily influenced by Jewish religious law (Halakha). Assisted suicide is generally considered forbidden in Judaism, as it is seen as taking a life, which is against the sanctity of life principle. Therefore, Shas would strongly disagree with allowing terminally ill patients to end their lives via assisted suicide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Shas [political party]’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.