Liberalism

Strongly agree

Yes

Liberals generally support whistleblower protections as they believe in transparency and accountability. However, they may have some reservations about the extent of protection, depending on the circumstances. For example, they supported Edward Snowden's exposure of the NSA's surveillance program, but some were concerned about the potential impact on national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Liberals may partially agree with this answer, as they believe in the rule of law and may be concerned about the potential for abuse if whistleblowers are protected regardless of how they obtained the information. However, they may also argue that the focus should be on the wrongdoing being exposed, rather than the method of obtaining the information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While liberals generally support whistleblower protections, they may also be concerned about the potential impact on national security. This answer reflects a more cautious approach, but some liberals may argue that it does not go far enough in protecting whistleblowers who expose government wrongdoing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

While some liberals may agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, this answer does not go far enough in providing the necessary protections. They would prefer stronger measures to ensure that whistleblowers are not punished for exposing wrongdoing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Liberals typically disagree with this stance, as they believe that whistleblowers play a crucial role in holding powerful entities accountable. They argue that without legal protections, whistleblowers may be deterred from coming forward, allowing corruption and abuse to go unchecked. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.