+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 488 Right-Wing Populism voters.

50%
Yes
50%
No
48%
Yes
38%
No
2%
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
12%
No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities
0%
Yes, and abolish the police

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 488 Right-Wing Populism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 488 Right-Wing Populism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Right-Wing Populism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9QQQNTLfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Some funding should be redirected to unarmed mental health professionals and responders for appropriate calls

 @9LC4TPN from Pennsylvania  answered…8mos8MO

We should increase funding of social programs and other means of preventing crime and reducing poverty. We should also commit to a more effective rehab system. Once we see a reduction in crime rates from these programs we can slowly ease off police force funding in accordance to how high or low crime is

 @9HKX6M6from Maryland  answered…12mos12MO

No, fund police to fight crime but also fund unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

 @9HDPVGPanswered…12mos12MO

Depends on the location, near borders police departments should get a relatively higher police budget than that of non-border police departments.

 @9GJ4LW5from Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

No, fund the police to fight crime, but also fund unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls.

 @95YRDMLanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9C5SMN3from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BG52L6from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, redirect funding from mental health issues and non violent crime like drugs to social and community based programs

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Defunding the Police” news articles, updated frequently.