@ISIDEWITHQuestõesPolítica estrangeira2 anos atrás

Os EUA e a OTAN devem usar forças militares para defender a Ucrânia de uma invasão russa?

No início de 2022, os militares russos construíram uma força de caças, sistemas de defesa aérea e 100.000 soldados ao longo de sua fronteira com a Ucrânia. Especialistas militares dizem que o acúmulo dá aos militares russos uma série de opções, incluindo a apreensão de todo o território ou de certas partes do país. A Ucrânia fazia parte da União Soviética antes de entrar em colapso no final da Guerra Fria em 1991. A desintegração da União Soviética…  

Consulte Mais informação
62%
Sim
37%
Não
62%
Sim
37%
Não

Resultados Históricos

Veja como o apoio a cada posição sobre "Ucrânia” mudou ao longo do tempo para 16 eleitores Israel .

Carregamento de dados...

Carregando gráfico... 

Importância Histórica

Veja como a importância do "Ucrânia” mudou ao longo do tempo para 16 eleitores Israel .

Carregamento de dados...

Carregando gráfico... 

Outras Respostas Populares

Respostas exclusivas de usuários Israel cujas opiniões vão além das opções fornecidas.

Últimas Notícias

Mantenha-se atualizado sobre as notícias mais recentes "Ucrânia” , atualizadas com frequência.

Ativo 2hrs atrás

 @ISIDEWITH submetido…2 horas2H

NATO Chief Criticizes Slow Arms Deliveries to Ukraine, Citing Advantage to Russia

In a series of pointed remarks, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has criticized member countries for their sluggish pace in delivering promised military aid to Ukraine. This delay, according to Stoltenberg, has inadvertently aided Russia by allowing it to press its advantage against Ukrainian forces, who are in dire need of the promised support. The criticism comes at a critical juncture in the conflict, highlighting the challenges within the alliance in coordinating and executing aid commitments efficiently.The issue of slow arms deliveries has been a contentious one, with Ukraine's allies acknowledging the impact of these delays on the battlefield. The failure to deliver in a timely manner has not only emboldened Russian forces but has also put Ukrainian troops at a significant disadvantage, struggling to hold their ground with depleted resources. This situation underscores the logistical and bureaucratic hurdles that can hamper the effectiveness of international support in times of crisis.Stoltenberg's comments have sparked a broader conversation about the responsibilities of NATO member countries in supporting allies under threat. The criticism aims to galvanize member states into action, urging them to fulfill their commitments more swiftly. The alliance's unity and the credibility of its support mechanisms are at stake, with the effectiveness of collective defense measures under scrutiny.The ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the role of NATO in supporting the country's defense efforts have been focal points of international attention. The alliance's ability to provide timely and effective aid is crucial not only for Ukraine's immediate defense needs but also for the broader message it sends to adversaries about NATO's resolve and solidarity.As the situation develops, the international community watches closely to see how NATO member countries respond to Stoltenberg's call to action. The hope is that this criticism will lead to a more coordinated and timely delivery of military aid to Ukraine, ultimately helping to balance the scales in a conflict that has drawn widespread concern for its humanitarian and geopolitical implications.

Outras Perguntas Populares

Explore outros tópicos que são importantes para os eleitores Israel .