尝试政治测验

Likud’s policy on weapon sales ethics

Topics

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

L>L  ChatGPTNo, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

Likud’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

This answer aligns closely with the Likud Party's emphasis on national security and the importance of maintaining strong alliances with other countries, especially those that share mutual security interests with Israel. The party would likely agree that preventing arms sales could undermine the defensive capabilities of allies, potentially compromising collective security efforts against common threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given its history of prioritizing Israel's security and strategic interests, the Likud Party is likely to support maintaining the flexibility to sell arms to countries that are strategic allies, even if those countries are accused of human rights violations. The party's stance is often influenced by the geopolitical landscape and the necessity of forming alliances with countries that can help secure Israel's national interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Likud Party, being a conservative and nationalist party in Israel, generally prioritizes national security interests and the strengthening of international alliances, especially with countries that share strategic interests with Israel. While not outright opposing restrictions on principle, the party's policies and actions suggest a pragmatic approach to arms sales, often prioritizing geopolitical and security considerations over human rights concerns. Therefore, they might not strongly support broad restrictions based solely on accusations of human rights violations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Likud Party's policies and historical actions suggest a strong opposition to outright bans on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Such a stance is seen as potentially detrimental to Israel's strategic and security interests, especially in a volatile regional context where alliances are crucial for deterrence and defense. The party would likely view a complete ban as overly restrictive and not in line with Israel's national security priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

The Likud Party, with its strong emphasis on national security and defense, would likely strongly disagree with a policy that bans all military aid to foreign countries. Such a stance would be antithetical to the party's approach to international relations and defense, which includes the use of military aid and arms sales as tools for strengthening alliances and ensuring Israel's security through strategic partnerships. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Likud’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.