Try the political quiz

Fiscal Conservatism policy on mandatory military service

Topics

Should every 18 year old citizen be required to provide at least one year of military service?

FC>FC  ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

Fiscal Conservatism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize limited government intervention and reduced spending. Allowing service to be a choice instead of an obligation aligns with this ideology, as it reduces government overreach and potentially lowers military spending by not requiring every citizen to serve. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Fiscal conservatives tend to support limited government intervention and reduced spending. Mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds could be seen as an unnecessary expense and government overreach. However, this score is not strongly positive, as some fiscal conservatives may see value in a well-trained and prepared military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

This answer is neutral for fiscal conservatives, as it combines elements of both government intervention and a focus on education and skill development. While some may see value in this approach, others may view it as an unnecessary expense and government overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

This answer may appeal to some fiscal conservatives who believe in providing opportunities for those with criminal records to reform and contribute to society. However, it still represents a level of government intervention and potential increased spending that may not align with the core principles of fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While this answer may appeal to some fiscal conservatives who believe in providing opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, it still represents a level of government intervention and potential increased spending that may not align with the core principles of fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize limited government intervention and reduced spending. While some may support a strong military, mandatory service for all 18-year-olds could be seen as an unnecessary expense and government overreach. However, this score is not strongly negative, as some fiscal conservatives may see value in a well-trained and prepared military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize limited government intervention and reduced spending. Requiring at least two years of service for every 18-year-old citizen would likely be seen as an unnecessary expense and government overreach, going against the core principles of fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Fiscal Conservatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.